Hey Brin, what license is your MUCK Log Mangler released under?

If it's a free-to-distribute-and-modify license (GNU would be nice) then I'd like to see it. Thanks!

By Brin Gaisce (Brin) on Friday, March 16, 2001 - 08:11 pm:

It's Artistic license, mainly because i despise the GPL, and the gun-toting widearse commies that stand for it (not looking at any one gun-toting widearse commie in particular *coughRMScough*).

http://www.redbrick.dcu.ie/~doc/src/MUCKmangle-1.7.tgz

It's messy, and uncommented, given that it hasn't seen the light of day yet. Bug reports, and feature patches welcome.

By XenoTech on Saturday, March 17, 2001 - 03:56 am:

Licenses in general are all strange. I get massively confused by them all... who doesn't?

GPL, Artistic, BSD... they fit into the category of "free to modify and re-distribute" to me. If I can grab a copy, read it, and edit it... that serves 50% of my purpose right there ^^

I'm by no means a Perl expert, but hey, it takes time. I'm much more used to C/C++ and Java. Far be it for me to design a C++ Log Mangler, though ^^ So whether or not I'll give you a patch is... well, depends on how hard it is to parse a log ^^